Player Clan Warship Search.
Jump to content. Hey everyone, I'm here with some discussion points on Personal Rating. First off, how accurate is personal rating? I've heard it's a good indicator of skill. Second, are players with more games going to have a higher Personal Rating most of the time, by the formula? From what I see, your rating starts low and then the more battles, the more it raises.
The of students admitted from California never doubles from one year to the next, and Exeter is never shut out completely. First, each man on the admissions committee feels in his own mind that a "good mix" is a necessary thing for Harvard College.
The admissions process consists of sifting tens of thousands of these hunches-some made by admissions personnel and others by New Mexico high school teachers and emerging with students. Admissions officials begin to squirm when the word "quota" turns up in conversation.
Subscribe to our newsletter. The admissions committee re that 10, times a year, Peterson says, and "it's hard to keep listening. That has become personal rating far the most important factor in Harvard's admissions process. Now only about applicants are rejected annually for fear they cannot handle the work.
In the computer compilation of the personal rating to a Harvard College class, there are a dozen s listed under each applicant's name. Personal rating Joel R. This does not mean that the man admissions committee-composed of staff and a varying of Faculty-has only to rate its applicants on "personality," and then simply accept the or so with the highest ratings; for example, no student will be accepted unless the committee believes he can at least get C's here.
And despite the statistical consistency of the class from year to year, admissions staffers work long and hard precisely because they refuse to rely on the s.
The correlation between admissions and the personal factor personal rating better than 90 per cent. Twelve or more hours a day, seven days a week in March and early April, advocates argue and re-argue their cases, votes are called, applicants are disposed of. As more recruiting has been done in the South over the past ten years, the dockets have been adjusted and more Southerners admitted.
Talk about quotas irks admissions staffers because they don't like to think of the admissions process as a mechanical one.
If this outsider relies instead primarily on the "academic" rating, he is likely to make a lot more wrong guesses than right ones. An applicant from a Southern high school, for example, solicited reports from two teachers.
But secondary school reports may provide the crucial fodder for a hunch, Peterson says, "especially if the writer avoids cliches. After all the numerical parameters are available, a computer examines the evidence and announces an approximate quota for each docket, based on how many were admitted from this docket last year and how the numerical evaluations of this year's students in the docket compare with this year's applicants overall.
Statistics like these suggest that getting into Harvard may depend on what your alumni interviewer had for lunch. Cotton, the senior member of the admissions committee with 23 years under his belt, points out that Exeter and Andover are not supplying as many Harvard students as they used to, "which the headmasters there understand personal rating which is difficult to explain to a personal rating who sent his son to Andover so he could get into the college of his choice.
The median SAT score has increased from to over the ten-year period.
But if the student is accepted by the area committee, his case must come up again before the full committee, since far too many students are accepted on the first run-through. But his personal rating was 4, and personal rating was rejected. But his alumni interviewer called him "one of the nicest I've seen this year" and the admissions staff rated his personality 1.
Dean K. Whitla of the Office of Tests shows in a recently published essay that for the Class ofthere is just about no correlation between admission to Harvard and such factors as SAT scores, rank-in-class, and predicted rank list. And they do.
Peterson calls it "a New Englander's map of the United States. While the selection process now approaches the ultimate in meritocracy, with each man considered as an individual who might or might not profit from four years at Harvard, there is nonetheless an incredible statistical consistency to the Harvard classes. It is an agonizing, seemingly irrational process, which only works if the men on the admissions committee have faith in it. Ten years ago, for the Personal rating ofadmission to Harvard correlated equally with academic and personal factors-that is, a student with a high academic rating and a low personal rating was about as well off as a student with a high personal rating and a low academic rating.
In the same class, a boy from a suburban Boston school with low 's on achievement tests, who spelled three words wrong in his essay, was accepted. Peterson calls the docket system "a kind of quota personal rating on the excellence of the boys involved. In the notebook used by former admissions dean Fred L. Glimp two years ago, there are personal rating like "Yale son" in a circle, or "soccer" followed by two exclamation points.
Humphrey Doermann, a member of the admissions committee and former admissions director, explains that the docket system avoids the possibility of admitting so many, say, from the West Coast-which the committee considers first-that there will be no room left in the class when the committee gets further east, in which case the members might get progressively stricter. Chase N. Peterson, now Dean of Admissions and Financial Aid, says, "We are justified and obligated to trust a hunch. Why does each class appear statistically like the personal rating ahead of it, if "quotas" are not used?
There seem to be two answers. Want to keep up with breaking news?
More important, there is something of a quota built into the admissions process. As an advocate argues, the Dean pencils notes into his seven-inch thick loose-leaf filled with computer forms. Which is not too far from the truth. His case will not even be presented before the full admissions committee unless new evidence becomes available or, as Whitla puts personal rating, "the advocate decides after sleeping on it that he didn't argue a certain case effectively in the area committee. Next to each name is a red "A" for accept or a blue "R" for reject-or a red "A" crossed out and replaced by a blue "R.
Every applicant is ased an advocate according to the geographical location of his secondary school. The change, admissions officials explain, is the result of better applicants. This personal rating the docket system. One applicant in the early sixties, for example, concluded his autobiographical essay with the sentence, "I aspire to become a student at Harvard so that I may live and work with the creme de la creme.
The advocate is one of three men who read and evaluate an applicant's folder, after which a preliminary decision is made in a small sub-committee responsible for a geographical area. This personal rating on the instantaneous reaction of interviewers, the wording of autobiographies, and the readability of reports appears subjective enough, but is only the beginning.
Applicants are personal rating into 22 dockets, according to the secondary school the student attended. But that, officials say, would be administratively inconvenient. The of Harvard sons admitted stays rather constant although the rejected is increasing rapidlyand the personal rating of public school students to private school students changes at a slow and smooth rate, in the direction of the former. If the admissions committee has just okayed nine consecutive students from a small town in Oregon, it will become wary of admitting more. This could, of course also be avoided by not classifying the students geographically at all.
If a student is rejected at this level, he is probably through. Sandy Koufax's earned-run average always hovered around 2. One of these is the "personal" rating-a from one to six personal rating on an evaluation of the essay the student writes, the report of his alumni interviewer, the report of his staff interviewer if he visited Harvard, and the reports of his principal and teachers.
Evaluations personal rating by staff and alumni are used more than the reports of teachers and principals, because the admissions committee knows who its interviewers are, and can take their tastes and idiosyncrasies into. Hunch material can be found almost anywhere.
Thus, if California's applicants suddenly become twice as good as last year by the s personal rating to the whole group, the computer will allot more places to California-but not twice as many. By the time the whole thing is over, you know everyone on the committee and where his psyche is. Perhaps the pivotal factor is how all this already subjective data is assessed by the applicant's advocate-the man who must present a student's case to the admissions board. Here the advocate must not only argue his man's case, but convince a majority of those present that his is a better applicant than some others whose cases are being argued.
Only generally accept their places, and some 50 more are added from a waiting list. But it does mean that an outsider, given only the computer data and asked to guess which applicants the committee will accept, will come close if he chooses those with the highest personal ratings, tossing in about students who are extraordinarily superior academically or athletically, and paying some attention to geographical distribution.
Though these quotas are not adhered to strictly, "if you go over the quota in one docket, it's painful when you have to undercut another," Peterson says. Doermann doesn't think the docket system imposes any quota at all, "but I can see why someone wouldn't believe me. He was not a "Harvard son," and he was not a great athlete. Perhaps, as Whitla suggests, the advocate himself will not be able to find it in him to argue a tenth case enthusiastically. The advocate system depends on having applicants grouped by area so the advocates can personal rating their schools.
Other members of the staff echo his faith in the selection process, which has remained essentially personal rating same since World Personal rating II. Peterson's concept of how to improve the quality of Harvard classes is not to change the basic process, but to recruit better applicants, particularly in areas where few students feel impelled to apply to Harvard.
Springfield single women looking for...
Only consenting adults are...
ListCrawler is a Mobile...
Katy Horny GFE 0....
for free. Welcome to...
I quickly noticed...
address:. The character...
I long joy...
Oriental Angels is...
Free Online Dating,...
Hello Gentlemen. Hope you...